A Review of Existing Forensic Laboratory Education Research and Needs Assessment

Existing Forensic Laboratory Education Research and Needs Assessment

Authors

  • Sabra Botch-Jones Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences and 2Boston University School of Medicine, Biomedical Forensic Sciences
  • Ronald R. Thrasher Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences
  • Bavette Miller Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences
  • James Hess Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences
  • Jarrad Wagner Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3377-1720

Keywords:

Forensic laboratory, Upper division, Graduate, Post-Graduate, Undergraduate

Abstract

Introduction: Forensic education is relatively new in comparison to other scientific disciplines as is content delivery via non-traditional, on-line, or hybrid academic programs. Published research on educational approaches is also limited. Therefore, this study identifies current peer-reviewed research in the area of forensic laboratory education regardless of pedagogy. Methods: A literature search using PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was conducted to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles. The search terms "forensic", "laboratory", "education", and "standards" were used to identify research in this area. Using the terms "forensic laboratory education standards" resulted in 155 results, however after a closer examination, only 14 of the articles were relevant to forensic laboratory educationĀ  (Baranski et al., 2020; Brooks et al., 2017; Burgess et al., 2011; Chohan et al., 2020; Dadour et al., 2001; Feliciano et al., 2019; Henson, 2019; Horowitz & Naritoku, 2007; Maeda et al., 2014; McKenna, 2007; Spencer et al., 2017; Stamper et al., 2020; Tregar & Proni, 2010; Zeller & Elkins, 2020). Results: The majority of the literature resides in forensic medical/nursing, biology, anthropology/entomology, and psychological/psychiatry education or is not specific to one forensic discipline. Each of the articles were assessed for target educational level (e.g., undergraduate, graduate, postgraduate/doctoral, medical or continuing professional education), forensic discipline, pedagogy, delivery style (synchronous, asynchronous, or hybrid), academic standards, and educational levels of faculty/authors. Conclusion: There is a significant lack of literature on the effectiveness of forensic laboratory education. There is a need for laboratory education research in the areas of forensic chemistry, biology, physics/pattern interpretation, crime scene/death investigation, and digital multimedia. Further, research on effective laboratory education that is supported by educational standards could be helpful to the forensic education community in considering content delivery, educational effectiveness, research needs for forensic education as well as assisting organizations who hire graduates of forensic science programs.

Author Biographies

Ronald R. Thrasher, Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences

Bavette Miller , Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences

Assistant Professor of Healthcare Administration

Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences

James Hess, Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences

Chair andĀ  Director, OSU School of Healthcare Administration Interim Chair of Forensic SciencesĀ  Professor of Family Medicine bankSNB Professor in Healthcare Administration Riata Fellow in Entrepreneurship OSU Center for Health Sciences

Jarrad Wagner, Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences

Professor and Director

School of Forensic Sciences

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28